Yeah, I thought he was a bit contradictory. On one hand he applauds diversity and on the other hand he wants consistency. You can't have it both ways.
windows menus definitely are not significantly better, especially the one long list of 'programs', what's annoying is that it's so trivial to actually just organize the stuff in a logical way, this has always been a very weak point for both kde and gnome, to me it's actually very hard to understand how something so basic is still an issue 5 years after kde and gnome started becoming decent options.
Cathbard hat folgendes geschrieben::
Yeah, I thought he was a bit contradictory. On one hand he applauds diversity and on the other hand he wants consistency. You can't have it both ways.
What about consistently diverse? Would that count as having it both ways
Ubuntu is generally quite easy to setup except for sound and then it is a dog. Why they don't include alsaconf is beyond me. That has to be the number one thing I get hassled about by Ubuntu noobs. Still, that's not all bad because it's sent a few people over here to Kanotix
The only thing I didn't like about Kanotix was that the graphics were uninspiring. Well you know what I'm doing in that department. I doubt anything I could do would stop Ubuntu being the ugliest thing this side of the public toilet at a chilli festival.
**edit** I stand corrected. It can get uglier. I just looked at those screenies of Kubuntu Edgy.........was the designer colour blind? What was he thinking? That is one of the worst clashes I've ever seen .... eerkkk
@h2: Long time ago you used Windows, because you did not mention how menus are managed there: By software company names!
Greetings,
Chris