| Autor |
Nachricht |
|
|
Titel: Stable Kernels
 Verfasst am: 15.09.2006, 11:09 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 15. Sep 2006
Beiträge: 3
|
|
Hello,
I see that actually three kernels are offered, what do mean the extensions for the different kernels : what kernel to use for a upgrade on AMD 64 bit
Stable Kernels
2.6.17.13-kanotix-2
2.6.17.13-slh-up-1
2.6.17.13-slh64-smp-1
Kind Regards
Roland Vlerick |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Titel: RE: Stable Kernels
Verfasst am: 15.09.2006, 11:12 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 17. Dez 2003
Beiträge: 16809
|
|
| For standard 32 bit Kanotix use the first, for Kanotix 64 the last one. The up kernel is basically special purpose. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 15.09.2006, 11:18 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 15. Sep 2006
Beiträge: 3
|
|
Hello Kano,
Thx I will use the last stable kernel. But as you allow me what is the meaning of the up kernel and/or what mean the slh in the name.
Sorry for being curious.
kind Regards
Roland |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 15.09.2006, 11:25 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 02. Mai 2006
Beiträge: 66
|
|
hello rvlerick!
the slh in the name means that this specific kernel is build by slh and up means that this kernel is build for systems with only one processor ( the other kernels are always compiled with smp support )
Greetings, EvNu |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 15.09.2006, 11:27 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 15. Sep 2006
Beiträge: 3
|
|
| Thank You, everything is very clear now. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titel:
Verfasst am: 15.09.2006, 16:12 Uhr
|
|
Anmeldung: 20. Okt 2005
Beiträge: 278
|
|
You might want to note that some systems (unfortunately almost all of my computers) have hard lockup problems with the smp kernel. I have no problems with the up kernel.
The up kernel seems to be the "safer" choice. It is also the logical choice if you have no need for smp.
-Crust |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
